On this page
CWE-1325: Improperly Controlled Sequential Memory Allocation
Weakness Summary
The product manages a group of objects or resources and performs a separate memory allocation for each object, but it does not properly limit the total amount of memory that is consumed by all of the combined objects.
- Canonical source: MITRE CWE-1325 (opens in a new tab)
- Published Atomicorp CVE observations: 2
- Distinct affected products in those observations: 1
- Active Atomicorp rules associated with this weakness: 4
Atomicorp Research Context
Atomicorp has published CVE-specific research observations associated with this weakness category. Each linked CVE page states whether the tested request was detected or blocked and is the authoritative customer-facing finding.
The CVEs and rules shown here are selected published examples, not a complete list of Atomicorp protections. If a CWE, CVE, or rule is absent from this page, no conclusion should be drawn about whether Atomicorp protects against that weakness or attack method.
A CWE describes a class of software weakness. It does not identify one exploit request, and association with a CWE does not mean that every vulnerability or exploitation path in that category is detected or blocked.
Selected Published CVE Observations
| CVE | Vulnerability | Product | Atomicorp finding | Observed rules |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-109618 | PHP - Remote Code Execution via Out-of-Memory Corruption | PHP | Protected by Atomicorp rules | 314143 , 330791 , 330793 , 340152 |
| CVE-2026-109619 | PHP - Remote Code Execution via Stale Global State | PHP | Protected by Atomicorp rules | 314143 , 330791 , 330793 , 340152 |
Associated Atomicorp WAF Rules
| Rule | Status | Behavior |
|---|---|---|
| 314143 | Active | disruptive (deny) |
| 330791 | Active | disruptive (deny) |
| 330793 | Active | disruptive (deny) |
| 340152 | Active | disruptive (deny) |
Related MITRE CAPEC Context
MITRE associates this CWE with the following attack-pattern entries. These taxonomy relationships are context, not Atomicorp coverage claims: